Back to Database
Status published
Medium
CVE-2013-0166
OpenSSL before 0.9.8y, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0k, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1d...
Vulnerability Description
OpenSSL before 0.9.8y, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0k, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1d does not properly perform signature verification for OCSP responses, which allows remote OCSP servers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via an invalid key.
Impact Analysis
Refer to official advisory for detailed impact metrics.
Remediation
Ensure systems are updated to the latest vendor-supplied patch levels.
THREAT MONITOR
Am I Vulnerable?
Launch our assessment wizard to check if your infrastructure is exposed to • CVE-2013-0166
Credits & Attribution
No credits recorded in the NVD database.
References
- http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=66e8211c0b1347970096e04b18aa52567c325200
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0587.html
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A19360
- http://secunia.com/advisories/55139
- http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20130204.txt
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908052
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=136396549913849&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=137545771702053&w=2
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00011.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=136432043316835&w=2
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0833.html
- https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-c03883001
- http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=62e4506a7d4cec1c8e1ff687f6b220f6a62a57c7
- http://secunia.com/advisories/53623
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/737740
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=137545771702053&w=2
- http://www.debian.org/security/2013/dsa-2621
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0783.html
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2013/Sep/msg00002.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/55108
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0782.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=136432043316835&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=136396549913849&w=2
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00027.html
- http://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAHXG
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A19487
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A18754
- http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5880
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A19081
- http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=ebc71865f0506a293242bd4aec97cdc7a8ef24b0
More from openssl
View All →CVE-2016-7055
There is a carry propagating bug in the Broadwell-specific Montgomery...
Medium
5.9
CVE-2016-6309
statem/statem.c in OpenSSL 1.1.0a does not consider memory-block movement after...
Critical
9.8
CVE-2016-6308
statem/statem_dtls.c in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL 1.1.0 before 1.1.0a...
Medium
5.9
CVE-2016-6307
The state-machine implementation in OpenSSL 1.1.0 before 1.1.0a allocates memory...
Medium
5.9
CVE-2016-6306
The certificate parser in OpenSSL before 1.0.1u and 1.0.2 before...
Medium
5.9
Affected Vendor
openssl
View all reports →Affected Software
openssl
Vulnerable Versions:
0.9.1c, 0.9.2b, 0.9.3, 0.9.3a, 0.9.4, 0.9.5, 0.9.5a, 0.9.6, 0.9.6a, 0.9.6b, 0.9.6c, 0.9.6d, 0.9.6e, 0.9.6f, 0.9.6g, 0.9.6h, 0.9.6i, 0.9.6j, 0.9.6k, 0.9.6l, 0.9.6m, 0.9.7, 0.9.7a, 0.9.7b, 0.9.7c, 0.9.7d, 0.9.7e, 0.9.7f, 0.9.7g, 0.9.7h, 0.9.7i, 0.9.7j, 0.9.7k, 0.9.7l, 0.9.7m, 0.9.8, 0.9.8a, 0.9.8b, 0.9.8c, 0.9.8d, 0.9.8e, 0.9.8f, 0.9.8g, 0.9.8h, 0.9.8i, 0.9.8j, 0.9.8k, 0.9.8l, 0.9.8m, 0.9.8n, 0.9.8o, 0.9.8p, 0.9.8q, 0.9.8r, 0.9.8s, 0.9.8t, 0.9.8u, 0.9.8v, 0.9.8w, 0.9.8x, 1.0.0, 1.0.0a, 1.0.0b, 1.0.0c, 1.0.0d, 1.0.0e, 1.0.0f, 1.0.0g, 1.0.0h, 1.0.0i, 1.0.0j, 1.0.1, 1.0.1a, 1.0.1b, 1.0.1c, 0.9.6-15, 0.9.6b-3, 0.9.7a-2
Timeline
Official Publish:
February 8th, 2013
Last Modified:
August 6th, 2024
Added to House:
July 19th, 2026
CVSS Vectors
Weaknesses (CWE)
No CWE data available
MITRE ATT&CK TTPs
No associated TTPs found for this vulnerability.